proxmox
Hyper-V is NOT Dead
Hyper-V is NOT Dead
#HyperV #Dead
“Pro Tech Show”
Hyper-V is not going anywhere, despite persistent rumours that insist it has been discontinued. For those affected by the changes Broadcom is making to VMware, Hyper-V remains a viable alternative. Where did these rumours come from, though; and what is the difference between Windows Server and…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
Hyper-V has better, more mature replacements already.
I just have a ton of issues with hyperv. Being a VCP maybe I just don't have enough experience with hyperv but I seem to run into speed issues with everyone I come across. I am looking at Proxmox as a replacement at least for my smaller clients. I knew that Broadcom would eff up vmware once I saw they were buying it. The minute Broadcom said they were doing away with the perpetual license I know it would be the end for most of my smaller clients.
Great video. thanks. VirtualBox users, migrate to Hyper V in Windows 10/11 Pro. It is a Type 1 hypervisor, so VMs run much fatser than VirtualBox, which is Type 2.
As a hyper v user in the enterprise and home lab , I love it and use it and making work with all my servers all across the world
Well explained. I don't think MS did a great job of explaining it at the time but hopefully videos like this will clarify the persistent misinformation. I'm actually glad vmware/broadcom are pulling the plug on free esxi, tired of seeing vmware presented as the only option. As you rightly point out, most customers will be licenced for Windows server anyway so the practical changes are very limited; and yes, I'd love to have a discussion with the people who have an exclusively Linux VM environment but running hyper-v on the metal ;D
Hyper-V is awesome, who has even suggested that?!