Artificial intelligence: A savior or the reason for

You can't speak Swedish very well, but you have a strong accent. That is cruel. You do have about twice the vocabulary of the average american.

kino

Miss understanding knowledge or what nature permits is very limited & well defined ranges of what can or can't be .
Our births relational reality with nature its blurry.
Csnt articulate it but we do kinda know . A roman soldier and modern person face value what knowledge is the same lol
Terminater bots astronomical energy density required is far from current convo.
Runaway endless tech doesn't exist because whst nature permits get weird and blurry denying such things. It just be gibberish entropic disorder without need or demand .no form or shape we would recognize.
This means obstacles of low concentration of minerals could be simulated until we find cost effective molecular structure to fake mimic of dig out cost effective extraction.
We have known 3rd final frontier underpining all of physics where get hints of merit in these fundamental features.
Computation + material sciences + human body mind and soul might all be required to sense the universe in all its glory phenomenally perhaps.
This is metamorphosis eqaulibrium balance optimization textualism methodology objectivism biblically prevailing unveiling pov obviously.
It is the The Christian to cosmos that allows us to dig out thermodynamical systems to begin with.
Relational reality
Which also warns of meglamanics exploiting and propagandizing human infrastructure not terminater bots

You really don’t know what GPT was? You shouldn’t be interviewing folks of this caliber, study more don’t be lazy.

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first.

What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing.

I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order.

My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

Bra gästval!