Hyper-v
Tomahawk Missile Are Superior to Hypersonic Missiles?
Tomahawk Missile Are Superior to Hypersonic Missiles?
#Tomahawk #Missile #Superior #Hypersonic #Missiles
“Military TV”
So, is the Tomahawk a better choice compared to Hypersonic missiles?
Despite the emergence of hypersonic missiles, Tomahawk missiles remain relevant, especially for sustained strikes. Their effectiveness and lower cost make them the preferred choice for long-range engagements, even if they are…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
lol
Of course western weapons are better, as seen in ukraine war. where are those super khinzals now?
Tomahawk is old but still gold.hypersonic missiles are like noisy dogs that don't bite.๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐๐๐๐๐
YOU NONSENSE CASES ARE HAVING A LAUGH ANT. THE MIND BOGGLES.
Where was it in AFGHANISTAN WAR?
โ ๐ฏ
God bless you โค
If they are so strong why need Ukraine to provoke Russia?
Tomahawks can fly at 100 feet (30m) and match terrain contours. There is no stopping them without it flying overhead a manpad equipped infantryman
When you're unable to make better ones, they are not bad either ๐
Apples ๐ and Oranges ๐ arguement. There are Target Sets. Where Subsonic ๐ค and Hypersonic cruise and tactical ballistic missile have role.๐ค Only YouTube Idiot Culture of Gen Z. They bri g forth such spurious arguments. Since they arent the ones Servicing,maintaining, launching these weapons. Too much WORLD ๐ of Warships and WarThunder online gaming. Not reality, against a concentrated, mobile Integrated Air Defense Apparatus, commanded by a Competent Theater Air Defense Manager. Look at the hebrew Air Experience in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, and draw Real Conclusions ๐ณ
Ask Serbian AA knocking them down in bunches
Any missile can improved on… Tomahawk design can be made smaller, faster, more powerful warhead, more processing power in small package and etc…. In fact, mini Tomahawk can be made to be fired from F18 super hornet, F35 Lightning or F22 Rapture.
One Hypersonic is More Than 10X the cost of a Smart (even Stealthy) Cruise Missile. maybe 1 or 2 out of the 10 would get through, but for the same price 1 or 2 F-35's could deliver Missiles to a Capital Ship. We still believe that Hypersonics "Can-Not -Be" Accurately Targeted in the Lower Atmosphere …. not unless they drop down to sonic or supersonic. I'd put my money on Stealth and Exceptional maneuvering of a Cruise Missile.
then we only need to use hypersonic missiles with nuclear heads
still no real hypersonic missile russian kinzhal hypersonic missile its a fake easily intercept and destroy easily by underrated patriot missile not once not twice more more and more
In hollywood
Wars are not won in Hollywood.
Your assertions are only outdone by the ignorance in the comments.
How is it possible.
Send some to Ukraine! That will get things going for sure!
They have a distance of around 2500 miles๐ฎ
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
You missed one of the biggest advantages of Tomahawks. They fly like an airplane with a turbojet engine. Thus, they can fly very long distances like an airplane at very low altitude. This enables them to literally fly under the radar, making them extremely hard to engage with air defenses.
Tomahawk flies nap of the earth soyouain't gonna see it until it's right there, hypersonics fly in the upper atmosphere, and between the radar signature, and the sun like IR signature they are impossible to miss. And are noharder to shoot down then ballistic missiles
A time and place for each tool, not to forget cost …
Ukraine shot down kinzal with ak47
Source: fucking hypocrat.
Precision strikes over speed strikes?, common sense counts leave it to analyst whom the best offensive stikes notable?
Both have a different purpose.. and if overcoming defense systems are required then cheap drones can also do it.. so it means cheap drones are better than Tomahawks?
there is a question about supersonic missile like russia till now they didn't show it why? is just an imagination or just a bluff are keeping this weapon in a volt while the russian military is now suffereing and still using world war 2 machine so i don't think russia have it today, it's all lie.
cheap drones with tomahawk missiles will fuck this shit out of any air defenses.
From an unqualified observer's standpoint although I am in instrumentation and control in automated processes. Perhaps the USA is not showing all their cards on the table about the capabilities of the tomahawk or LRASM missile, so its Axis Nemesis like China Russia or north Korea is not aware of its stealth and jamming as well as its maneuvering capabilities.
It all makes sense now! Tomahawk is plain and simple way more bang for your buck'!!
is this a feel good channel? hahahaha