Hyper-v
Can We Really Understand the Universe? with Paul Sutter
Can We Really Understand the Universe? with Paul Sutter
#Understand #Universe #Paul #Sutter
“Event Horizon”
Thank you to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to to get a special offer.
Paul Sutter’s Links:
Rescuing Science: Restoring Trust In an Age of Doubt
How to Die in Space: A Journey Through Dangerous Astrophysical Phenomena…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
Thank you to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to http://keeps.com/eventhorizonshow to get a special offer.
Paul should shut up about the woke stuff, he is brainwashed beyond repair and can probably never be salvaged.
Stick to physics and cosmology.
pysics (2:11) must be easier than physics
I get 42 vibes from this discussion. Even if we get the answer, would we understand it?
Mystery about the universe is mystery about you.
Enjoyed this greatly until it went political about denying "science" and "vaccine" "efficacy". How ironic.
it's just our local area… a small part of everything… probably so small to appear like a plank to a scientist relatively to everything… the voids.
Remember, OpenAI has released Sora to certain developers and film makers. We, I mean they, are putting out videos NOW that are created with powerful AI that creates videos from text prompts that are indistinguishable from reality. DON'T believe anything you see!
"What if we lived in a universe where Claudine Gay didn't plagiarize her work?"
What if we lived in a world where the vaccine DID stop the spread or prevent people from becoming infected with the virus?
We grew up in a world where that is EXACTLY what vaccines did.
And he wonders why we "Don't trust the science?"
When that is what the media parroted as science for over two years, how can we trust THOSE scientists at least?
Copernicus questioned the earth being the center of the universe and he was mocked by the mainstream just like scientists that questioned the vaccine were mocked by many in today's scientific community.
When "science" comes out with statements like climate change can't be tackled until Gaza is free, people suprise suprise think you are frauds 😑
This was amazing
Put John on doing the adverts. If ANNA does it I have to listen to them in full. John I can skip! 😊
Stutters opionion is that the publics bias towards science is unfounded, but says many papers today contain junk science; wishing for the ignorant simpleton to accept this same "science"… Got it.
Interesting question about what % completeness physics we have. It seems like we have a pretty satisfactory model to explain our experience as humans living on earth, but a step function increase in our ability to understand things in general is needed to understand any more complete model we can come up with.
31:30 Had me all the way until he said anti-v***r movement. Way to buy into the tribalism and propagate hatred for your own people. I’m no longer interested in your interpretations on this subject or any for that matter. Unsubbed
Wow what a rant. That was painful.
This has been the most interesting episode in a long time, thank you.
I watch Paul's youtube channel avidly and find his rich outlook compelling.
I'd go as far as saying, out of all the mediacentric scientists, he truly deserves to be regarded as another Carl Sagan, with the advantage of a delightful incisive sense of humor.
Great video and information !
A big problem with the way science is done is that scientists (and the "ifl science" crowd) are highly scientistic. They believe that scientists have a monopoly on truth and right policy.
Meanwhile, scientists publish garbage and get worse results. As one joke goes, "We've had 100 years of psychology and people are more anxious and depressed than ever."
Worse still, scientists, like everyone else, are driven by political and economic biases, and these result in bad papers and public harm.
So despite claims to authority on knowledge, scientists routinely get things wrong and promote harmful products and policies. Then, when people notice this, they just tell the public they're stupid and need to fall in line.
Good way to quickly destroy an institution. In 500 years, "science" will be a form of black magic and the people practicing the scientific method will have other terms for their work.
This guy: science doesnt need falsifiability to be valid.
Most scientists: theres no solid proof of extraterrestrial visitation. UFOs dont exist
Dude talks with such arrogance and authority as if he's the best there ever was and anyone elses opinions and research is trash
curious if temprature variations in the microwave background are due to some directions being slightly more or red shifted than others or the number of photons/brightness from different directions – it never seems to get mentioned.
how much of the variation is due to being diverted by gravitational lensing from passing close to galaxies and their associated dark matter – the hubble deep field shows how almost every direction you can look contains something that would lense light passing through.
if theres a possibility thet dark matter might be clumpy would it be possible use the CMBR to either map dark matter clumps arround the milky way rule out its clumpyness?
Fraudulence sneaks its way into anything but its roots tend to be similar as how piracy works. the enviroment we nurture supports the behaivior displayed. Creating reasons not to pirate or practice fraud are huge goals easly undermined but we gotta try.
Good discussion as per usual.
Good interview. I'll have to check out his book. Long been interested in things like the replication crisis and trust in science as an institution.
Loved this! Even with the people in the comments SEEKING to have a problem with things. Bored people will do boring things.
Thank you Event Horizon team!
Keegan-Michael Key's best sketch yet!
This guy soinds like he is on his ninth booster.
Maybe we should be focused on just seeing what we can improve on testing instead. Like what are limits of testing instead of trying to figure out if certain theories are even testable..
Good interview. I really liked the guests perspective on the "junk science" and how science is hurting itself. From my day to day convos with people everyone is noticing it.
Brah seems unfamiliar with the concept of computational irreducibility
Paul is a legend. He’s correct to highlight the structural flaws in science these days. He’s also correct to go out on a limb and ruffle the feathers of those that were unfortunately caught up in the anti-science backlash
Could the voids be where we find the antimatter galaxies?