Starship Refuelling Test Imminent // Perfect Resonance System //

The coverage has been so technically poor in real inside data and the information so minimal that is hard to see what lessons were learned on IFT2. I hope they were able to figure it out. Hard to glean anything from all the FANS channels

Fuel systems to convert frozen water 💧 at the moons pole into hydrogen and oxygen for rocket 🚀 fuel ⛽️ so spacecraft can go further and also return to earth 🌎 will first have to be built on earth . Then shrunk and componentised so they can be transferred to the moon to do that job by using rockets 🚀 to get it there. It can save a lot of money if those designs are improved upon before being built. Design version one of such equipment is of no use if it could never be used. Especially if it would require something like the 15th design to be fit for such a purpose and ability to get it to its desired location. It is a lot cheaper to draw the designs on paper and improve them over time rather than build 15 different designs that are possibly useless that could never be used at the desired location. Hopefully such designs for a moon based rocket 🚀 fuel depot are already being considered and improved upon. Would likely take several spacecraft flights to get components for such a fuel depot onto the moon. Then the thing would need to be assembled by astronauts who would only have limited air and supplies to remain on the moon to assemble it and make it operate successfully. Meaning that the operation of assembling it would need to be timed on earth 🌎 to reduce construction times in an effort to help it be successfully built at its final destination. Also ice would need to be removed from moon surface and be purified before electrolysis of water could commence to break it into hydrogen and oxygen. Once built that would mean that storage tanks for hydrogen and oxygen are needed for quick transfer of rocket 🚀 fuel or astronauts wouldhave to wait for electricity to do the job slowly . 🐌. Possibly meaning waiting weeks or longer for the tanks to pressurise with rocket 🚀 fuel.

I've got a question.

Just joined but I've been watching for a few years.

Do we have image satellites around every planet in our solar system and if not why not?

You would think that by now we would have such a thing.

My kids love Google Earth but they wanted to know why we still don't have any maps that are viewable of other said planets in our solar system.

I realize this would be extremely expensive though.

But we've had years to accomplish this since we haven't gone back to the moon. Just asking for my son.

Is there a limit to how massive a black hole can get? Has anyone done the math to see what would happen if the entire mass of the universe were in a black hole? Is there potentially a threshold in which a black hole flips a switch becomes a white hole, or a "big bang"?

Just one suggestion Fraser, if you put the poll shortly after the video it might be easier, like I would go and vote right after watching but after a couple days I've already forgotten 😀

The notion that the proposed test – moving fluids from one tank to another in the same spaceship – is comparable to in-space ship-to-ship refueling… is laughable. This is nothing more than a PR stunt… to placate NASAs concerns over timelines and to fan the fan-base… especially after two failed to reach orbit test flights. Get to orbit first, then get back down with losing only one tile (Space Shuttle maiden flight)… then work on refueling with a real-tanker ship. Elon wants to skip steps… and that's dangerous.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS ON ALL ROCKET LAUNCHES , STOP THE NONSENSE , MY VISION AMAZON HOTEL LOUNGE BAR , FOR GET AWAY WEEKEND'S , STOP THE NONSENSE ,, PSALMS 115 : 16

Hey lately your audio editing has gotten worse, there are sudden loud voice almost as if you are shouting and sometimes too low, can you level your audio please? It breaks the immersion and is an unpleasant experience

So the nebula is between 900 to 1900 years old and 30 light years across? Seems stretching things.

another question for the question show:

one of my favourite subjects in cosmology are the cmb and baryonic acoustic oscillations. Now, if we know the scale of how those particles had to be clumped up in the plasma, and extrapolate that out into the larger structure of the universe, wouldn't it be possible to derive a standard candle from them?

i mean, those shock waves could have only reached a certain size, right? and it should be uniform everywhere in the universe. so, couldn't we use the large scale structure of the universe to essentially measure itself? in my idea we would look at galaxy distributions along those shockwave imprints in the filaments, and by measuring their angular apperant size, we should be able to derive how far away the imprints have to be, to appear as large as they do. we would have to take time into account the further they are out, of course, but…is this doable? I assume this would have fairly sizable error bars, but we could use those to put confines on our distance ladder. A rough estimate that should still be uniform enough to give us a good idea of when other methods are widely differing in their own results

i hope i worded this in a way that makes even remote sense

Yes. A Robot 🤖. Anyway I’m sure many will disagree, I apologize if I offended anyone. Had to be honest.