Mining

My Conservative Miners Price Targets For 2024 with BTC

My Conservative Miners Price Targets For 2024 with BTC @ $100k & $240k! SEC Hacked On Twitter!

#Conservative #Miners #Price #Targets #BTC

“Sebastian”

In this video we’ll take a look at my latest conservative 2024 Bitcoin miners price targets with BTC at $100k and $240k. We’ll also discuss the SEC getting hacked and tweeting that the SPOT BTC ETF’s were approved.

Patreon membership starts at $5 per month and includes access to our private…

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

35 Comments

  1. Yeah bitfarms and cifr sbojldnt be given the same P/E ratio as Cleanspark/Mara/ and maybe Riot.

    They have nowhere near as much growth in the pipeline. Bitfarms has a goal of 12 EH/s and possibly 17 EH/s.

    Cleanspark will be at 32.0 EH/s at least

  2. That’s why the HODL means so much the halving will crush the miners but the ones who have a nice size hodl and BTC say is at 90k those companies with HODL price will literally double in price.

  3. Technical analysis is a crucial part of understanding market trends, especially in the dynamic world of cryptocurrencies. Historically, Bitcoin (BTC) has experienced significant corrections, often around 30% or more, particularly in January. This pattern offers a valuable insight for strategic planning. Despite these trends, BTC is showing promising signs, potentially breaking through the 50k mark, demonstrating its resilience and potential for growth. While there are external factors, like ETFs, that could influence the market, these elements add to the dynamic nature of crypto….At the heart of this evolution is Linda Wilburn, whose deep understanding of both cryptocurrency and traditional trading has been instrumental. Her holistic approach to investment and commitment to staying abreast of market trends make her an invaluable ally in navigating this new era in cryptocurrency investment.

  4. Thanks a lot for your work. I was wondering if there may be a possibility that you underestimate too much potential growth of smaller miners like mawson and Sphere 3D. If they manage to keep their debt problem under control aren’t them poised for at least a X5 from here?

  5. Here's how to play the cycle, or at least for me. Buy a miner at 2022 pricing (for me this was CORZ at 0.33 this past November and 0.6 earlier last year) then ride that up to pre halving, after NASDAQ listing could easily be 4-10 by March where I would cash out multiples like 10x on the price but also multiples on the shares due to the warrants and distributions. Then I would put that in 2x ETF BTC in March or on a dip and run that into December. Then see where BTC is and if it goes to anywhere close to 150k then close long positions and start opening short positions with the inverse 2x ETF. Once BTC goes to 150k you know the top is there or close. Then I would wait a year from the peak top to bottom at which point after exactly one year I would close all inverse positions and switch long again on some yield bearing BTC ETFs and some other alt ETFs possibly. This plan assuming CORZ entry in November low would bring something like 20-30x cash basis on CORZ exit, then another 5-10x on the ETF long play, and another 5x-10 on the short ETF play (5x at the 100k BTC level, 10x at the 200k BTC level). Do a 20 X 5 X 5 times $$k and you can imagine the numbers. Then do it again on the way up from the 2026 bottom to 2030 top like another 10x or more and you can see some wild numbers. The 2x ETFs will absolutely outperform the miners after halving and once we get an inverse, shorting the BTC top will be where the real money is.

  6. Thanks. I love price prediction videos. 4x last cycle top is around 200k. Conservative target 120k. Question is end of 2024 or mid 2025 top? Anyway the worst miner is HUT and HIVE, basically anything Canadian is terrible. The best obviously MARA. But in terms of most undervalued CORZ. I mean CORZ is 1/10 market cap of MARA mining something like 1500+ BTC a month by March, pure cash machine with debt eliminated after warrants are exercised. For current holders, well some got it at a fraction of the current price like me at 0.33 and the warrants, distribution, ERO, and exit plan act like a 4x multiplier on the shares currently held.

  7. They're being shorted to death. I know shorting the stock is important for liquidity but man….who constantly pushes price down to kill every company? Really not alot of faith in the manipulation of the markets. Had just got back in and I'm right back out….your videos have been helpful, perhaps I'll play this casino another time.

  8. I'm 100% CLSK until Jan 2026
    I think CLSK is the top dog?

    Am i wrong? Any "non-financial" advice?

    I hv never came across such good quality researched videos on miners. Very underated channel.

  9. Which miner would be safe until jan 2026? (2yrs) CLSK?

    As I'm from india. If i withdraw my gains before 2yrs, I'll be taxed heavily in india as per slab rate (30-40%). But only 20% after 2yrs (LTCG Tax)

    "NFA!"

  10. I really wish we could see net income estimates based on $/kwhr costs, rather than just spit-balling some %-of-gross-revenue. The percent estimate is rough because it is highly reflexive to hashprice, and so it's quite inaccurate to just come up with an average over 12 months. I also don't know if 50% is reasonable… In Q4, no miner will come anywhere close to 50% of revenue being income, despite hashprice reaching heights that are greater than the theoretical conditions you are looking at (I think).

    Even just assuming $0.10 / kwhr would be pretty close. Sure, it would ignore depreciation and interest, but by and large it's a pretty darn good estimate of how their costs will scale.

    You could easily incorporate this into your sheets. For each miner, add a "costs" row, and for each month: Take their fleet size, multiply by estimated J/TH (or just use, say, 25), and you have the MW of power demand… from which you can get how many KWHs they use; then just multiply by $0.10 to get their overall costs. Subtract that from the revenue, and you have an upper bound on net income. Seems easy because you don't need to add any additional information per miner.

    To get to net income, you pretty much just need to add in depreciation costs.. which you could roughly estimate (I know you track their fleets!) It'd be a little more work, yes. But I think having a solid upper bound on net income would be a nice improvement.

Leave a Reply