Mining
One of the world’s biggest mining companies say Carbon
One of the world’s biggest mining companies say Carbon Capture is a SCAM
#worlds #biggest #mining #companies #Carbon
“The Electric Viking”
One of the world’s biggest mining companies say Carbon Capture is a SCAM
Get a 20% discount to Electrify Everything in Sydney from the 9th – 11th of February, 2024. Use my discount Code: EVIKING
20% discount applies to all ticket types.
šš Buy something and support The Electric Viking…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
For every molecule of CO2 there is an atom of carbon and two atoms of oxygen … Let's not lower the oxygen level too much! Seems no one understands where asphalt roads come from either … Petroleum!
Reality is the exact opposite of what you are programed to believe.
Thru our massive release of co2. With industry we have actually saved life on this planet from extinction. And yes I can show proof.
No taxpayer money should ever go to this scam – start with eliminating all fossil fuel subsidies instead!!
Carbon capture only captures a small amount.. has been proven to be a farce and taxpayers are forking out millions for something that simply doesnāt work as well as they say it should. Take a look at WAās Gorgon mine.. very dirty.
Worked directly in CCS research for 6 years right out of college. It's a scam as far as being good for the environment. CO2 does work well for enhanced oil recovery. CCS research is likely not going to yield any positive results for humanity, but it might help get more oil out of the ground. Your tax dollars at work…
Stop nonsense and stop burning shit (more than CO2 is polluting, remember?). Instead of spending all that money on capturing CO2, use it for planting trees instead. So much forest has been cut down all over the world for the past 1000's of years. Let's bring some of it back to help lower the harm done
It isn't often that one agrees with the mining industry, but TREES and PLANTS have learned to SLOW WATER through the landscape, increasing NATURAL PRODUCTIVITY. This will capture MORE CARBON than the amount needed, because LIFE BUILDS ITSELF. No factories required, thank goodness . . .
Plant a twiggy- it will grow into a tree.
An expensive way to make fizzy water. Let the trees sequester the carbon. Capture is stupid.
Carbon Capture has always been a transparent scam. If you sweep the crap under the carpet, it doesn't go anywhere, for a while. If you compress crap and manage to sweep it under the carpet, it doesn't go anywhere, for a while (definition: a while – sooner or later).
Viking, you know and I know that you are biased and misleading. There is a huge difference between CO2 and ICE immitions. CO2 is something we need to sustain life on this planet, except many people like you belive that CO2 in atmosphere causes global warming. Could you just stick to EV stories.
Yep. Itās a scam. https://youtu.be/MSZgoFyuHC8?si=fibmL10wDx-L_jgL
Carbon Capture are a subsidie.
The oil companies pump co2 down to increase the pressure.
Oil is subsidized $7T (2023).
This make the fossile cars subsidies $21.875.
And if we recycle the plastic, we don't need to pump oil.
Lets start with the plastic floting in the sea.
Musk is a fool and an idiot, twiggy forest has a scientific background, you as an australian should be aware of that.
Re the thumbnail – I love how we are always being showed pictures of steam from cooling towers because most people will mistake it for smoke or C02 which even Greta claimed to be able to see – yeah, and I can see oxygen, right. I also love how they make it look as dark as possible with simple photographic techniques, shadowing the light. Obviously you can't photograph C02 so they show us water vapour – job done lol. (QI – Stephen Fry, explained that steam is actually invisible too so I suppose water vapour is a better description even though we all call it steam)
What else would oil companies say……Sam…………Lots of fud………..
Does anyone else remember John Howard going on about carbon capture in the 1990ās ?
Carbon capture is one of many choices to reduce the increase of CO2 in our atmosphere. CO2 has increased every year since the beginning of the measurement in Hawaii decades ago. There is no doubt a profitable carbon emissions reduction is the better choice and is progressing. Until then, cap-in-trade is the alternative.
"It's a fugayzi, fugazi. It's a whazy. It's a woozie. It's fairy dust." – The Wolf of Wall Street
Oil companies used ācarbon captureāas part of their tertiary oil recovery. Wet carbon gas is very corrosive. In fact they donāt know how much carbon dioxide has been pumped into the earth and they donāt know how much remains. Nearly all of the people who use the term have little knowledge of what is involved. As it is like āabracadabraā all is settled.
Have you heard of ccs Project of equinor? They guaratee no leakage from the northsea seabed.
Carbon Capture is an activity with no benefit other than the removal and sequestration of CO2, and which obviously takes effort (hence, money) to do. It can NEVER BE anything BUT "uneconomic".
Carbon capture and green hydrogen are a match made in the boardrooms of oil companies.
Let's use a huge amount of energy to remove some of the emissions from our energy production!
The kind of logic that only makes sense to energy executives.
The real falsehood is taking CO2 to be a dangerous polutant that can heat the planet, such as what happened to Venus, in the short (or long) run. They also claim it is settled science to which 97% of climate scientists (BTW, there is no such thing) agree, where there are literally thousands of top notch physicists and engineers that say otherwise, and recent revisit of the study yielded it actually show only 0.3% believe that GW is due to antropogenic sources or it is dangerous. The propenents of GW theory also believe that wind and solar power generation will save us when all theortical and real world evidance clearly show that it will do absolutely nothing except raise our electricity bills five fold, whilst make our power availability strong as lake ice cover on April (on the northen hemisphere), emit way more CO2 than they are willing to admit, will grately increase the overall fooprint of power generation and polute the soile in the country of use and in the counrty of manufacturing.
GW is nothing but a scam proppled by human hating idiolody, ignorance and will to control and power over ordinary people, aided by like-minded press.
Best coverage I've seen anytime lately. Delightful to see a major heavy industry embracing the advantages of Battery Electric Vehicles after conducting their own 1st-hand experiment to determine the practical pros and cons. Thank sfor reporting on this.
It has always been a lie. Obviously so.
It is quite simple, all they need to do is convert carbon to diamond, then alone is it actually captured. Pumping gas underground will never be really locked up.
Love your channel. Please stop giving credit to politicians for investing in technologies. They merely allocate taxpayer dollars. They just spend our dollars.
Offsetting is biggest theft of wealth next to income tax.
The real answer is to consume less energy, and people don't like that
If carbon capture worked someone would be doing it on a big scale already. I think (and what do I know) that there are lots of big companies taking government money to āresearchā the subject when they know it probably wonāt work.
Iām glad youāve picked up on this issue. Carbon Capture and Storage is central to the GHG reduction policies of most countries, but the technologies are unproven and the majority of the proposed CCS is not intended to remove existing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (which is essential), but is being developed to capture new emissions to enable the continued burning of fossil fuels. So, as you say, this is a scam to protect the fossil fuel multinationals.
Sadly however, to safeguard the Arctic, Antarctic and alpine ice, humanity is now committed to removing and storing hundreds of billions (~100,000,000,000) of tonnes of excess atmospheric CO2 over the coming decades. If we donāt, we will irreversibly change our climate system and destroy the ecosystems on which we depend for food. So, whether we like it not, humanity is now committed to spending trillions of dollars a year on CCS. Letās hope it works ..
What ever is captured will be released back when the plant dies, there is no such thing as a free lunch !
Using oil for plastics can be replaced with bioengineered plant based alternatives
A fan
Fortescue have bought out Williams Advanced Engineering and are going on an enormous electrification plan. Kudos to them for trying.
Photosynthesis works. The rest is bullshxx.