proxmox
Is Gaming On The Ryzen 9 9950X Better On Linux Than On Windows?

Is Gaming On The Ryzen 9 9950X Better On Linux Than On Windows?
#Gaming #Ryzen #9950X #Linux #Windows
“Level1Linux”
Y’all like Linux? Of course you do, that’s why you’re here! Wendell gives you the scoop on the more powerful half of AMD’s Ryzen 9000 offerings, and makes a strange discovery about gaming on linux.
0:00 – Intro
0:48 – Overview of the CPUs
2:26 – How about performance?
3:42 – A word on…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
I'd rather buy Zen 5 than Zen 4 purely because they consume less power. That's nice. Less heat always means better longevity and I tend to use computers for a long time. I prefer 9700X. performance/power usage/price ratio is excellent.
wel tha is alotm of nothitng . do sam test show sam comparing stuf gen samting .. .if it is jsut 5% tha is not a lot nad weil weil not move enyone from tha monram win 7 or win 10 ..caz wel i jsut detecett a big deferct in otimization ..capla of days a go on saom one elses video on a old celelron cingal core cpus tec lol it is ridichilor but veri treu !! ..as fro linux na hel no no redy yeat not ive v25 wel thy have probels ey !! adn 150 disros ov it man no hope on theat nay tiem soon nop not at all !! yea yea fin !
how about the latency and anti cheat support for multiplayer games? wonder if you guys would ever deep dive into system latency for competitive games. thanks!
Definitely, go team! 👏🏼
0:26 I've known this. as your windows system ages, the performance gaps between linux and windows will be more apparent.
I haven't finished the video yet, but as a Rust 🦀 developer I'd love to see some Rust compilation benchmarks. I'm currently running a 3950X, on socket AM4 and 64GB DDR4, and really like it.
Please update us soon on this. I'd love to see gaming benchmarks where Linux is beating Windows that aren't Valve games, or down to the graphics driver not supporting features that are available on Windows.
Proton is using Windows libraries via Wine.. (I'm sure everyone knows that). It is likely that older versions of Windows that utilize those same libraries would perform just as well or better. Wine isn't utilizing the latest Windows libraries yet, at least btly default anyway.
My 7950x3D is so much faster in Arch with KDE even running it from an external 20GBPs USB Type-C enclosure from Delock (42000 product id, chip ASM236X) which is installed on a slower NVME drive to begin with (Adata XPG GamingX s11 Pro 512GB vs the WD SN850X 4TB which is directly connected on the CPU and is the System drive and the Gaming drive), and that's with Windows 11 debloated af and running significantly faster than it did before that (especially regarding responsiveness) yet, i can even tell from the movement of the Orochi V2's mouse that the accuracy level is on a different level in Arch, it feels way more responsive, and wwwaaay more accurate, settings, programs start faster.
Games like WoW in Raids keep 80+ FPS and way more consistently (same exact graphics settings) in 25 man raids and i am like…Windows…i have even tried to disable every hidden and possible power feature (including core parking) to see what might be making such a quantifiable difference, and i can't find what's causing this.
I can't explain how Windows is so bad at …being an OS, things just feel, buffered.
i was waiting for 9000 series i wanna buy a new pc , so i shouldn't get a 9000 series ? i picked i7 14700k then that news came they are instability issues etc so was was waiting for 9000 series
Chip built with servers in mind
"In the past 5 years"
What my head says "Yeah, AMD's really grown from Zen 1 and Zen+!"
What reality says: Zen 2 to Zen 3
Is that an old Logitech MX Revolution?
I’ve been running my 7950x machine with 96gb just like you recommended back when I got it, and it’s never given me one bit of trouble. It lets me play metro exodus with physx on my 3080, while I’m running docker AND serving data to another machine at 400 mbps over WiFi. Like holy crap
At 8:10 there is one hell of screen tearing…
AMD accidentally promoting Linux.
Too bad every other gaming "journalist" tech outlet has already labeled Zen 5 as not worth it since they were stuck on Windows. Imaging not telling your gamer audience about a 5-10% performance uplift. The worst apart of it all is these gamers would happily push us back to Pentium 4 or AMD FX era if it meant getting 3 more FPS because gaming matters more than actual uarch efficiency improvements.
You need to test windows on the hidden administrator account, it currently boosts performance a lot
Windows is hot garbage
Sounds like Zen 5 is the final "excuse" I've been waiting for to switch to Linux
20% uplift in DevOps workloads? I guess I just found my next upgrade path at work. <3
Can you tell your speculations what AMD is "paving what incredible things for Zen 6"? Do you know more, or did you see a pattern?
It would be an interesting video to watch.
Got to admit I wasn't expecting the Hitchhiker's reference 😅
What rackmount case is he using here??
I don't really get how now would be the great time to move from AM4 considering the fact that there's barely any real uplift from Zen4 and memory stability still isn't that great. I'm still gonna hold out till Zen 6. Maybe if the new chipset handles memory better than what we have now.
YES, this is the PC Build I want.
Workstation(Productivity)
At first I wanted the AMD AM5 Ryzen 7950X.
Server Based/ and DAW User…
But I still wanted to do Video Editing up to 1440p…
And maybe a decent GPU(maybe?)
The difference in performance (where Linux is beating Windows in gaming by a few percent) seems to line up with a Windows bug that Steve from Hardware Unboxed mentioned in his video following his latest Ryzen review.