Unraid

Lincplus Lincstation N1 SSD NAS Review – A Silent,

Lincplus Lincstation N1 SSD NAS Review – A Silent, UnRAID NAS?

#Lincplus #Lincstation #SSD #NAS #Review #Silent

“NASCompares”

The Lincplus Lincstation N1 NAS Review

The Lincplus N1 IndieGoGo campaign is now live and you can follow it here –

We have made a…

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

21 Comments

  1. Update , Lincplus reached out to respond to my comments on choosing Indiegogo for their crowdfunding: "The reason why we chose the Indiegogo platform is that Indiegogo has a customer support team in our country while Kickstarter does not. We have always invested a lot of energy in R&D and production, but marketing is our weakness. This is our first time using crowdfunding for promotion and producing a product, so a local support team is very helpful to us. We will offer the same after-sale service to customers who buy from Indiegogo as Amazon customers, and we will offer the best price on Indiegogo. We will also collect feedback from the first batch of customers."

  2. 8:40 "this thing is a finger print magnet"
    I wouldn't worry about it too much. The design seems to lend itself well to being vinyl wrapped. I'm here for a wood grain wrap for that 70s VHS style… front or top laoder. hmm.

  3. Given the high cost of SSDs in decent sizes it’s hard to justify then limiting the performance of those drives you’ve just paid for.

  4. its good to see a NAS aiming for people who want all-flash because it's quiet & small, and not because we need a blistering fast dual-socket 40gbe monstrosity, tbh, 10gbe would be nice, but then I'd have to pay for it, and maybe hear them cooling it

  5. Just noticed that the breakout animation show on the Indiegogo product pages shows a fan running inside the case! So it the NAS using an active cooling solution and thus isn't really a completely silent or passively cooled device?

  6. I don't understand how this product is launching on late 2023 and not using an N305 CPU instead. It seems like poor product management on their end. This is a system that will be pretty expensive to equip, being all SSD storage based. I don't think the potential buyers would have been turned away by the higher price needed to accommodate a more current CPU with still low TDP

  7. I want a nas that sips power and is silent. Nearly all clients use WiFi, so 2.5gb Ethernet is sufficient for my requirements. People obsess about how fast the nvme drives can be pushed, or how fast the networking is, but that’s not important to me. It’s faster than my current hdd based storage, lower power and SILENT.

  8. Hi

    Can you help me please ?

    My problem in DSM that I can’t review the file there except the pictures, all other files like pdf , vid , doc ..act can’t review

    I have a lot of pdf files and I have to open one by one find what I want also the other files

    So what shall I do ?

    Thank you

  9. This looks really promising, but just having the one 2.5GBe on an all flash system seems like a very odd choice to me. Even if stepping it up wasn’t possible for some reason, I feel like it should have at the very least a second port here.

  10. I'd love for someone to work with AMD or Intel and bring either low power embedded Epyc or a D Xeon to this market. U.2 in smaller capacities can be almost as inexpensive as M.2 and even a mixed use gen3 drive cost/performance will blow the pants off consumer gen 4 M.2 for this kind of use in the long term (and there's always the option of buying used).

    I'd rather pay more and get a device with more PCIE lanes, U.2 and 10gb support (not to mention hot swap and higher RAM capacity support) than something like this or the Flashstor. Something like the QNAP TS-h1290FX but with say 8x bays and 1 1gb or 2.5g port and 2 SFP+ (or let the user add in a 10/25gb NIC) for maybe $1000ish. Hell, if they could make it around the price of a used R730XD even better.

    Worst case if Synology can get away with charging ~$2k for their 8 bay devices I guess the price could go that high but give me modern hardware with U.2 support.

  11. When I think of "6-bay", I think of all six bays supporting the SAME architecture, and allowing a RAID array that includes ALL 6 drives. The real gain here is meaningful – drive space lost to parity is 1/4 in this device, and is only 1/6 in the Flashstor. If you're using 4TB NVME, that means you lose 4 out of 16, leaving 12 (10.5 in the real world) vs 4 out of 24, leaving 20 (18.7 or so, in truth). The usable capacity of the Linkstor is, in this scenario, less than 2/3 that of the Flashstor 6. Add to this the UnRAID SSD limitations, and I have to see the result as an interesting, but limited solution for those with rather modest needs and budgets.

Leave a Reply