Hyper-v

AI Just Changed The Video Game Industry Forever…

AI Just Changed The Video Game Industry Forever…

#Changed #Video #Game #Industry

“Going Indie”

AI is enabling anyone to create games of their own without any experience. What does this mean for the future of game development?

🔵 Join the Going Indie Discord

🐦 Follow our Twitter

📃 Research Links
AI…

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

50 Comments

  1. Sounds like the book Scythe, where the thunderhead rules it's a super AI intelligence. It can perform every job on its own but it employs humans to do stuff because it knows humans need something to do or they'll just give up.

    Maybe this is where we’re heading

  2. I would just like to say f*ck ai. I’ve decided that instead of sitting around and feeding prompts to ai I would take the time to learn art. I will never let it take over creative jobs, and if I have to I’ll go and live outside of technology. We should only let it take over the repetitive tasks, but letting it take over creative jobs is certain doom for humans. We need some purpose or else we’ll not even want to live.

  3. 5:26:
    unless u know what to look for andmif they dont move or talk its very hard to see at a first glance this is not real ppl (except maybe for the guys right ear (left) even on max zoom and resolution….😮😮

  4. If you're really competent at your job, you will always have it. At the worst scenario where AI is doing all the work, you still need the most qualified people to curate it and correct it. This will be the case for a very, very, very long time.

    As for people worried about losing their jobs, I wouldn't be that worried long, long term because if food and manufacturing is so inexpensive and efficient to produce, it's not likely the world will let everyone starve and be homeless if correcting the problem doesn't cost anything relative to production. Even for the wealthy, it's in their interest to prevent crime and chaos. It might actually lead to a more star trek-like state than you think.

  5. you may think AI doesent know what we want because it cant feel itself, BUT feelings can be coded (ours are causal as well) once all interactions are understood (which AI will be able to analyze) and just e.g. imagine an AI reading all comments on steam reviews or otherplatforms and forums about games, about game types, about what we liked and disliked in them, combined with the AI watching any analyzing all lets plays and their comments, with the AIs knowledge of human psychology, with it knowing when in a game the youtuber made a suprised expression or when he was frustrated and bored.
    and you think AI cant analyze all that, understand the bigger picture of what we want, what a fun game would be like, and produce that 1000 times better and faster than any human ever could?
    not just that, once that superior game is done, it could CONSTANTLY evolve with player-feedback, even individualized. you complain "i dont really like this storage only having 3 tabs. why isnt it infinite?" and they AI responds with "the purpose behind this mechanic / design choice is, that…." if you understand the purpose maybe you think its a good solution or if you still dont like it, what keeps the AI from just recoding it within minutes to fit your preference? the AI could just pick up on complains and ideas for improvement non-stop, maybe formulate questions based on that and make a small survey every now and then (that player would cladly take because it would mean the game was gonna improve for them as well) and then change things majorities agree to be bad? etc.

    there is NOTHING a human will be better in doing than AI (including AGI and AGI in robots + whatever is to come). even quality control (like you examplified wit the picture) is only needed by humans as long as humans are better in evaluating :D. we will repeatedly teach AI to be closer and closer to what we actually want/like/feel things should be, by giving it feedback, to the point where it knows better than us because its an assimilation of all our evaluation knowledge. it will be able to produce things you THINK you dislike but only because you werent even capable of understanding the whole picture, leading to you feeling dissatisfied in the long run if AI actually listened to you and removed it.

  6. we game devs prefer quality and control over quantity, usually. AI created stuff has only either of them but never both. we hate that. Yes eventually AI will be able to make usable assets for us but right now, it's still crap.

  7. AI will eliminate 70% of all jobs while probobly creating only 10%. You will need less people for everything only overseers. Don't let no one fool you. The change will be slow slow over these 5 to 10 years before that estimate 70% of all jobs lost comes true. I promise you.

  8. THIS IS NO LONGER FICTION. It's all coming together just how i like it. People are just mad that AI is faster and obviously more efficient
    So to make those people feel better. Adapt and evolve into a hybrid of flesh and machine! It's only a matter of time to peacefully accept . HALF N HALF

  9. Why do you think they push for universal basic income. Can we maybe finally do something great with our talents and creativity? Together with AI? Maybe it isn't that bad to work less.

  10. I dont think they'll be an ai engineer making moc ups. More like the few people left on the art team will need to familiarize them selfs with the latest tool. The ai engineer may be in charge of creating proprietary tools or finding the best tools for the company.

  11. Tofu survivors is full ai game. the bad thing is i am addicted to it because i like killing thousands of monsters on levels… i wonder if there are more games which are made fully with ai:?

  12. Your wrong. AI does not, nor will it EVER be able to re-produce, creatively and wholly, the process that humans undergo to create art. I've heard AI music, seen AI art, etc. Its never to the standard of humans and never will be. Machines lack that soul.

  13. I'm honestly so excited to have made it to this moment in history where creativity has the potential to truly explode in ways previously unknown. I wish there wasn't so much fear and negativity surrounding the subject because I love to talk about the potential and someone always feels the need to slide in with hardcore doomerism, because they can't see how these tools and ideas can improve their world yet. I really feel like the way this is shaking out, individuals and indies are getting the best deal out in history being able to multiply their creative output and free themselves while major companies are going to start to struggle to compete while cutting corners. Individual creativity will go further and have more impact which I predict will elevate many developers. It feels like watching the same cycle over again with motion capture, drones, and probably the invention of photography as relating to portrait painting. Uncertain futures generate a lot of fear and negativity but that's the nature of evolution and if your a digital artists or game developer you are quite literally operating on the cutting edge of technological progress.

  14. They'll use AI before it's ready, and it'll cause many deaths, just think how multi billion dollar game companies release buggy crap. You can't rely on it, the whole thing is not as competent as people think it is, it does have blind spots.

  15. it's a good thing that it breaks the barrier for non-coders… imagine someone with a really good idea without the experience now have tools to work with and can make a working model.

  16. Soon every game will be a different world. Imagine how NPC's will act if they are powered by GPT-4. Imagine NPC's being able to create custom events related to the game's setting and storyline. This will unlock sooo much potential for future projects

  17. Also, Congress regulating AI?! Firstly, how on Earth would that be enforced? Secondly, unless it is to address the fact that some AI shamelessly and consciously by their creators to use copyrighted and premium artwork instead of using Public Domain or fre to use stock images when generating images or using the AI mimicking voicesof people still living without consent, there is no point. I bet the bill talks little to nothing about those things.

  18. People need to stop using ChatGPT and learn how AI actually works, not a vague or generalized explanation.

    AI can help simplify repetitive and tedious processes of game development, while humans can work on everything requiring not tedious and repetitive. If you let an AI or set of AIs attempt to do everything, the following will happen:

    1) All image files used will either be copied or derived from something pre-existing and will not be aware of it being copyrighted in some cases causing legal issues.

    2) Dialogue will sound robotic or nonsensical. In addition, giving an meaning or "soul" behind the story and dialogue is beyond the capability of all AI due to a lack of dynamic and complex nature of emotions that may lead to questionable results.

    3) In order to make a video game of complexity and quality that is functional, the AI will not be able to properly handle logic errors, may write redundant code, and will fail to take advantage of optimization tools and features of certain programming languages or make them non-backwards compatible, which may be detrimental in some cases.

    4) There will never be anything original in the video game. By their nature, AIs require deriving from pre-existing information and resources.

    5) Many image-generating AIs are guilty of deriving from official and copyrighted artwork and tend to look like artwork ripped from D&D-like artstyle and/or an overly detailed anime artstyle. Also, generated images will lack correct anatomy for organisms like giving 6 fingers for humans, clothing blending and unblending with skin at random, and/or cats with 5 or 6 legs.

    Lastly, I want to mention that ChatGPT is being corrupted with more bias data every day.

    I wanted ChatGPT to be something that I could bounce ideas off of and/or act as an assistant to find out how to do something instead of helplessly scouring forums, threads, articles, and videos for answers. It failed to be even that.

    Lastly, voices can be replicated via AI; however, you need a HUGE reference database, train it, which may take many, many days, account for different speeds of talking, tone, emotion, volume, and seamlessly blending syllables together without it sounding "distorted and monotone-like" tends to sound like raising one's voice and holding a specific volume, or sounds normal but lacks any dynamic nature to how a sentence is spoken, which tends to come across as uncanny.

  19. Not much different than when the rooms of draftsman were replaced by a few CAD stations and soon the engineers would just go straight to the CAD station rather than dictate to the team of draftsmen.

  20. You're technophobe dude… I love AI and the possibilities it gives… also what's the difference between being in love with other human.s biological electrical impulses from his/her brain… and electrical impulses in the silicon brain… same electricity… just generated i different way… because AI needs a powerplant to power it, while We need a farm to eat…

  21. Why wouldnt ai be able to understand emotion given everything it has come to do in nov 1 2023? That seems a bit of a cope. People were wildly wrong about art, music, philosophy, and other complex thinking tasks. Why exactly would emotions be entirely unique and immune to understanding. Especially when they have remained consistent for 10,00s of years if not more. AND we have trillions of data points to feed Ai. That part just doesn’t make sense. The rest i jive with

Leave a Reply