Hyper-v

Animal Movie Review | Ranbir Kapoor | Anil Kapoor | Rashmika |

Animal Movie Review | Ranbir Kapoor | Anil Kapoor | Rashmika | Bobby Deol | Sandeep Reddy Vanga

#Animal #Movie #Review #Ranbir #Kapoor #Anil #Kapoor #Rashmika

“Filmkopath”

Here’s our take on Animal, that is already generating polarizing feedback from the general audience to critics. We try our best to objectively analyze the film.

Background Music Courtesy:

“Scott Buckley – Undertow” is under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 3.0) license

/ musicbyscottb
Music…

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

16 Comments

  1. Best review … thanks for helping me express… this movie made me sad and worried. I couldn't express well.
    With every word you had said in this video , is the very emotion I wanted express. Thank you thank you so much. πŸ™ πŸ™πŸ™πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

  2. I thought Filmkopath is a an intelligent reviewer but he's just a stupid reviewer like any other reviewer. Director titled the movie as Animal for specific point perspective. All reviewers need to unlearn lot of thing and free your minds to watch film at it's purest projection.

  3. While I agree with the issues you raised here, I think you missed some very basic ones. I hardly watch Bollywood movies because I find them really boring. I went for this one because I find Ranbeer interesting. And was I surprised by the movie!Iits really fun in the first half, ( second half was boring) and I am still in the trance of its BGM and swagger. I am surprised by the grip it had in me, evoked something more primal than civility and societal morality. Bollywood movies have very little effect on me and I sleep through most. Its very honest, the film. I am a woman and I would love to have a man like Ranveer protect me and stand for me. In the era of emaciated masculinity and soy boys, this movie is a breath of fresh air. It evokes very primal emotions. I have felt the rage that was displayed, the animal like responses, the honest but brutal reactions but did not display them like the main character did. Yes the movie shows a character who is persona non grata in civilized society but his emotions are all too real. If you remove the sheen of civility and control over society's 'appearance' pf goodness, you will find the same intensity inside many of us, men and women at the core. And I do not understand the complaints of misogyny. The Ranbeer character time and again tried to stand up for his sisters but nobody noticed? His wife slapped him around. He cheated yes, but are you all perfect? I have seen so many extra marital affairs and domestic abuse cases hidden beneath the sheen of sophistication. Appearing as a good human being is different from being a good one. Most people, I can assure you, are rotten but display goodness. This character does not hide himself.

  4. I think it is both problematic and unprofessional to comment on things which are outside of the film's boundaries. You are merely extrapolating things and judging the filmmaker by things outside of the film. Review the film not the filmmaker. Jimmy Cage and Baradwaj Rangan provided more balanced views.
    And when it comes to the topic of misogyny and other problematic aspects. It is better to establish what is misogynistic in the film, if it's the character and not the film itself. And if you feel the film itself was misogynistic then you need to explain it how, again without resorting to comments or information regarding the filmmaker or other things outside the film.
    I personally didn't feel the film was justifying Vijay, he was clearly portrayed as a psychotic sociopath, someone more animalistic than human, every dialogue of his reflects this. Animals can't be misogynistic right?
    Now, I understand some people in the audience might cheer for his problematic behaviour but one shouldn't cloud their review due to this because we have seen these kind of things happen time and again, where the filmmaker intends one thing but something else happens. From Gordon Gecko to Tyler Durden to Jordon Belfort, there is no shortage of men celebrating toxic and problematic men. But should we admonish the filmmaker for that?
    Anyway, expected a better review from you.

  5. Thank you so much for speaking up. Where every other reviewer is glorifying this movie for gory , misogyny and every other things , I really missed a story.
    Am a simple man, I go into the theatres to be amazed by a good story and people who are building it.
    It felt to me that the first and second halves of the movie were made my two different directors.
    Sandeep vanga had such a deserving cast and crew and he just threw everything to the drain to appeace his ego or gain the verdict of validation that he wanted to gather from the generic , lesser minded , no-so-passionate-about-films critics.
    I too could see the flair in Sandeep of being a path breaker for gangster films In India like a Scorsese but I guess I was aiming or expecting too much from too less of a director.
    Money can always be a motivation but it can never be the goal.

  6. Extremely sensible review. I have no intention of watching the film. But this film exactly represents current day India a new Pakistan.

    I am seriously trying to find out what kind of films were made in both East and West Pakistan between 1955 to 1970 when India was making Garam Hawa or even Pakeeza.

Leave a Reply